Describe the Causes of War and Conflict. - 825 Words

War and Conflict P1- Describe the causes of war and conflict. In this essay I will be giving the definition of war and conflict and I will be describing the causes of war and giving examples of wars that have happened because of the conflicts that I will be mentioning in my essay. The causes of war I will be looking at will be; Politics, Nationalism, Ideology, Land, resources, historical rivalry, ethnic conflict and religion. These are the main causes of war. War is a conflict carried out by force of arms, between nations, states or between parties within a nation which can be on land, sea or in the air, always caused by something. It’s a clash of interests which results in violent armed struggles and can affect†¦show more content†¦This can cause wars because some people might not agree with the ideas of getting something organised. This is because it could make things more expensive or the Government could put up the price of oil making countries go to war because they want to be the sellers of the oil. The roots of the Cold War are the ideological struggle between the Soviet Union and the West that began after the Bolsheviks seized power in 1917. Historical rivalry is a cause that will never go away. This is because some countries never want to sort their difference out. Historical rivalry is a rivalry between counties that have had problems in the past. For example England and Scotland, have always had their differences. The differences started when there were two kingdoms; The Scottish Kingdom and the Anglo-Saxon kingdom. This caused several wars between the two countries because of their disagreements. I think that there is always more than one cause of war this is because countries wouldn’t just go to war because of land they would go because there is also oil and natural resources that could be veryShow MoreRelatedThe Ethics Of Warfare And Ethics1550 Words   |  7 Pagesethical decisions when discussion about warfare. Are war ethical or not? Does war bring any resolution to the conflicts or it just bring more conflicts between nations and states? Have history of warfare demonstrate whether or not wars have ever resolve the initial purpose of the war? War ethics only defines whether the purpose of any war is right in order to initiate any conflict among nations. But history has proven that humans have always uses wars as a mean of resolving political, structural, religiousRead MoreThe Causes Of War And Political Conflicts926 Words   |  4 PagesWar and political conflicts has caused a great deal of trouble, suffering, and human disaster for millennia’s. The factors that led to the cause are fear, interest, standing, and revenge. Often times political leaders, of mostly powerful states, declare war either based on interest in resources, the desire to be the biggest power, to cause terror on other states, or simply to get revenge. Throughout history, many of these wars and conflicts that were fought by the Greeks vs. Romans, Spanish vs. AztecsRead MoreConflict Speech790 Words   |  4 PagesGood morning teachers and peers, today Im going to discuss conflict, the affects it has on people with examples from two texts. |    What is conflict? Conflict is another word for fighting, battling, or struggle. Conflict can be expressed in many ways, such as; war, hate, aggression, bullying, and competiveness. Conflict has negative effects on people. Conflict can result in death, mental illness, suicide, and destruction. Conflict is cause by many reasons including differences in values, desires, needsRead MoreGeopolitical Factors Between Nato And Russia Essay1222 Words   |  5 PagesFuture relationships between NATO and Russia are very uncertain. These uncertainties are due primarily to geopolitical factors like globalization, economic interdependence and international law. This leaves the world to question the possibility of a conflict arising from these clashing geopolitical factors. First, Russia, one of the major powers, has expanded economically and militarily by increasing trade, communication and even showing military force in other countries with the fight against ISIL.Read MoreTheme Of The Illustrate d Man1694 Words   |  7 Pagespost World War II society and a current Cold War environment. The time period and characteristics of World War II, the Cold War, and foreshadowing of the Civil Rights Movement serve as important influences for Bradbury’s subject and themes of the novel. Recurring ideas of censorship, technology, justice, and largely death, exist in events and fears of the day. Leading all themes to tie into an allegorical warning Bradbury directs to an audience of American youth, fearful of nuclear war with theRead MoreConflicts Involve a Clash of Ideas, Interests and Expectations.808 Words   |  4 PagesThe vast amount of causes for conflict and the ambiguity of each reaches an overwhelming total. The sort of a particular conflict is highly dependent on why the conflict has occurred, as individuals posses differing core values and beliefs. Conflict is born when aspects of individuals or groups clash. There are infinite aspects that make up an individual, but three remain prominent when it comes to tracing where conflict has originated from. Ideas, interests, and hopes or expectations of an individualRead MoreHow Poetry Can And Can Not Say Many Things957 Words   |  4 PagesPoetry can and cannot say many things in many ways. Poetry in the Twentieth Century pertaining to the Great War or the First World War gave people an idea about what poetry could say and could not say. Poetry during the First World War would often either conceal the true nature of the conflict going on or poetry would gruesomely paint the conflict for what it was worth. Robert Brooke’s â€Å"The Solider† conceals the First World War’s ultimate brutality by claiming it as a noble endeavor, Wilfred Owen’sRead MoreIrony, Allusion, Metaphor, Personification, Alliteration, And Comic Relief1199 Words   |  5 PagesDescribe the setting of this novel. The boys are stranded on an unoccupied island. It seems as though it is somewhere in the Pacific in the 1950’s. It is an unknown environment which is very peculiar. As young boys, they expressed a great amount of enthusiasm once they arrived. After this initial feeling, the reality of the absence of adult supervision came to their realization, and the threat of the real world set in. This island possesses several jungle characteristics such as dense undergrowthRead MoreInternational Relations And Forced Migration1618 Words   |  7 Pagesrefugees a security threat? For whom? In their work, Refugees and Forced Displacement, International Security, and Human Vulnerability, Edward Newman and Jan van Selm describe how mass and forced displacement of populations have been used as a weapon during conflict: â€Å"refugee flows are demonstrably a source of [†¦international conflict] through causing instability in neighbouring countries, triggering intervention, and sometimes providing a basis for warrior communities within camps that can form theRead MoreSome Doubted the Idea of Conflict756 Words   |  3 Pagesdoubted the idea of conflict Both the Prince and Charles Sorley present the idea of conflict as a disease that had started of something meaningless. Shakespeare during the Princes speech at the start of the play is suggests that conflict is futile and is not worth the damage it causes. When Shakespeare describes conflict as something ‘bred of an airy word’ it is clear that he views conflict as something pointless and insignificant. The word ‘airy’ suggests that the conflict is spreading and is affecting

Kant s Categorical Imperative Of Universal Laws And Humanity

Kant’s Categorical Imperative of Universal Laws and Humanity People have an intrinsic worth above mere things or possessions. In order for people to cohabitate peacefully and respectively, there’s a need for universal laws based on good will and absolute moral beliefs. It is this moral belief which is based on reason and must be uniformly abided by. This allows humanity to function as an amicable society; an amicable society that is achieved by treating ourselves and others with respect and dignity. Immanuel Kant’s theory known as the categorical imperative expressed an absolute belief in universal moral laws which enables humanity to be treated well. (Rachels EMP 129 139) Categorical Imperative and Universal Laws Important to realize is universal laws or moral rules are a necessary part of society. Without rules, society would not function properly, and a breakdown of humanity’s social structure would soon follow. If no one kept their word, then no one would be believed or trusted. Hence, nothing would ever be accomplished. It would stand to reason people must keep their commitments. Kant’s categorical imperative is defined by reason and binding for all rational people. (Rachels EMP 135) Kant maintains that â€Å"act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that is should become a universal law.† (qtd in Rachels EMP 130) To clarify, if one’s actions can be based on a rule or maxim that can be followed without exception by everyone,Show MoreRelatedKantian Ethics1459 Words   |  6 Pageson individuals that have a major impact on one`s life. The teachings usually start from a young age through parents, caregivers and educators in s ociety. Due to their influence on young children`s lives it is their responsibility to make certain that young children will learn to make logical decisions that would contribute in a positive way in society. An ethical theory that would best describe people that influence young children would be Kantian`s ethics. His ethical theory elucidates that moralityRead MoreKant And The Categorical Imperative1177 Words   |  5 PagesImmanuel Kant was a philosopher who tried to work out how human beings could be good and kind outside admiration and devotion of traditional religions. Kant was a pessimist about human character and believed that we are by nature intensely prone to corruption. This became more clear to Kant after reading the work of philosopher David Hume. It was this that led him to formulate his life’s project, the desire to replace religious authority with the authority of reason, that is human intelligence. WhenRead MoreWhat Has Posterity Ever Done For Me By Robert H eilbroner1626 Words   |  7 Pagesresponsibilities towards future generations in regards to preserving the planet. In this paper, I will present Heilbroner s arguments for posterity, in relation to how we treat our environment. In addition, I will compare two ethical theories, Kant s Categorical Imperative to Mill s theory of Utilitarianism. I will then argue as to why Utilitarianism is more plausible in respect to Heilbroner s environmental view on posterity. Furthermore, I will point out why Kantian theory does not at all support the ideaRead MoreThe Moral Value Of Ethics1261 Words   |  6 Pagesthe moral value of actions. Immanuel Kant is an influential figure of Deontological Ethics. He proposed three laws called â€Å"The Categorical Imperative† to decide whether an action is ethical or not: 1. Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law. (Ibid., 422) 2. â€Å"Act as though the maxim of your action were by your will to become a universal law of nature. (Ibid) 3. â€Å"Act so that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in thatRead MoreEmmanuel Kant and Moral Theory1589 Words   |  6 Pagesto show the methodology by which individuals derive moral truths and the fundamental nature of these truths. Overall, Kant s philosophical works are still extremely relevant to modern political and philosophical conflicts and his legacy survives in the essential concepts of liberalism, egalitarian ethics, social contract theory, cosmopolitan global justice, and many others. Kant is also considered the founder of the 18th century doctrine of transcendental idealism and many of his published worksRead MoreKant And Mill On Animal Ethics Essay1365 Words   |  6 PagesIn this essay I will begin by explaining the overall views of Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill, then compare and contrast the ideas and philosophies of Kant and Mill on Animal Ethics. I believe that Kant, the deontologist, will not care as much about the duty/responsibility between humans and animals as Mill, the utilitarian, who will see the extreme importance of animal ethics. After studying and explaining the views and teachings of these two philosophers I will see if my thesis was correct,Read MoreKantian Ethics And The Categorical Imperative Essay1581 Words   |  7 PagesReason Book, I, Immanuel Kant, a prominent late Enlightenment Era German philosopher discusses his most famous ethical theory, the â€Å"Categorical Imperative.† The â€Å"Categorical Imperative† is a proposed universal law in stating all humans are forbidden from certain actions regardless of consequences. Although this is the general definition of this ethical theory, the Categorical Imperative† exists in two above formulations, A strict interpretation of Categorical Imperative and a more liberal interpretationRead MoreImmanuel Kant s Philosophy On Moral And Good And Evil Behavior1413 Words   |  6 Pagesaccording to Immanuel Kant, who is one of the most influential philosophers of all times, believes that human beings should not be making decisions based on the facts of a situation, but should act according to universal moral codes that apply in all situations regardless of the outcome. Kant refers to these universal moral codes as categorical imperatives and must be fully followed at all times across all circumstances. In his work, Groundwork of Metaphysic of Morals, Immanuel Kant talks about threeRead MoreCritique And Critique Of Kantian Ethics1812 Words   |  8 PagesColin Rinne PHI 110 Ethics Kant Analysis and Critique 3 November 2014 Examination of Kantian Ethics â€Å"There is no possibility of thinking of anything at all in this world, or even out of it, which can be regarded as good without qualifications, except a good will.† (Kant, pg.7 393). No other thing that may appear good can be unqualifiedly good, as even â€Å"Talents of the mind†¦Gifts of power†¦[Other] qualities†¦Have no intrinsic unconditional worth, but they always presuppose, rather, a good will, whichRead MoreThe Metaphysic Of Morals By Immanuel Kant1199 Words   |  5 PagesGroundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals by Immanuel Kant: A Reflection and Analysis Author name Name of institutionâ€Æ' In man’s attempt to figure out what is right or wrong, they have developed a number of systems that purportedly deal with such matters. Immanuel Kant expanded on his moral philosophy in his work, Groundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals. This paper will be a reflection upon Kantian ethical principles presented therein and their relation to what is generally called morality. People

Japanese Foreign Minister Fumio Kishida

Question: Discuss the main purpose of Kishidas tour, Comparison of Japans foreign policy agenda in the visit, Differences of Japans foreign policy agenda in the visit, Rivalry between Japan and China in Southeast Asia. Answer: Introduction Japanese foreign minister Fumio Kishida began his state visits to China and other South East Asia nations on April 30th 2016 in Beijing China. In May 1st 2016 he visited Thailand addressing delegates in an Association of South-East Asian Nations (ASEAN) policy meeting (Anon, 2016). He later moved on to Myanmar on May 3rd 2016 and held several bilateral meetings with top government leaders. On May 4th 2016 he paid a state visit to Laos and ended his visit in Vietnam on May 5th 2016 (Anon, 2016). The motivating factor to these state visits by the foreign minister can be attributed to Prime ministers Shinzo Abes quest for popularity based security jewel with economically strong nations such as United States and Australia and also reach for democratic relations with their neighbors that is South-East Asia nations (Aljazeera, 2016). This is due to of Japans realization that China had up surged them globally and regionally in terms of economy (Aljazeera, 2016) hence the continued lobbying by the minister. Main purpose of Kishidas tour The foreign minister was representing the countrys and government foreign agenda policies in the neighboring countries with the theme being continued bilateral relationships which maintain foreign trade, security and political harmony among them (Anon, 2016). In China he was seeking to affirm the importance of his countrys relationship and restoration of mutual respect alongside stressing the significance of economic cooperation especially by the youth and private enterprises (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 2016). In Thailand not only was he there to address the ASEAN policy delegates on the need for embracing diverse cultures and human resource connectivity but also sign a Memorandum of Understanding to foster the agricultural sector (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 2016). His visits to Myanmar, Laos and Vietnam focused on continued cooperation in all sectors of economy and respect for the rule of law as stipulated by International laws which they are all party to (Anon, 2016). Comparison of Japans foreign policy agenda in the visit The Japanese foreign minister tour in these five countries to meet with his foreign counterparts and discussed their countries close cooperation. The issue of reciprocal participation and vital organization emanated strongly as they stressed the importance of having continued links. This cooperation was to exist regionally and internationally so that a favorable working and investment environment can be achieved for Japanese people in these countries. On further enhancing regional cooperation the minister stressed the need of strengthening ASEAN community for further integration and correction of conflicting issues in the policy. Discussions were held on the relentless implementation of endeavors to fortify the East Asia Summit (EAS) (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 2016). On Maritime security between these countries minister Kishida clarified that the South China Sea is specifically connected to territorial peace and thriving and is a wellspring of shared sympathy toward the worldwide group including Japan, and focused on the significance of applying the rule of law (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 2016). The foreign ministers concurred on the significance of the serene determination of contentions taking into account global laws and respect of human diversity. On the issue of North Korea minister Kishida expressed that the continuation of atomic weapon and rocket advancement, including ballistic rocket dispatches by North Korea, is inadmissible and that it is critical to reinforce weight on North Korea by entirely actualizing the Security Council resolutions and taking different measures, and that Japan wants to coordinate with ASEAN in regards to the snatchings issue and human rights infringement by North Korea (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 2016). Differences of Japans foreign policy agenda in the visit The ministers visit targeted different economic cooperations among each country uniquely since resources in these countries also may differ. While in China minister Kishida advocated for realization of five departments to work on: ((a) full scale economy, money related and fiscal issues, (b) environment and energy-saving issues, (c) a low birthrate and a maturing populace, (d) tourism, and (e) fiasco counteractive action) (Anon, 2016). The Chinese government responded positively to these considerations. In Thailand the minister stressed clarified that Thailand's sustainable development was critical for Japan too, and that Japan means to keep the participation going on. While there the minister signed a Memorandum of Understanding between the two countries in regard to the agricultural sector so as to further create a favorable investment environment between the two countries. In respect to the national referendum scheduled for August 2016 in Thailand the minister hailed the process of placing power to the people and forming a democratic government (The Asahi Shimbun, 2016) In Myanmar minister Kishida clarified that the government of Japan plans to give undeniable backing, while figuring a particular project of participation, predominantly in the fields of employment creation, farming, and medicinal services, where the government of Myanmar is putting accentuation. He additionally remarked Japans arrangements to collaborate in reinforcing networks through framework building, framework changes, and human asset preparing under the Japan-Mekong Connectivity Initiative (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 2016). While in Laos the minister put forward a proposal on formulation of a joint development cooperation plan in agreement with Japan-Mekong connectivity initiative. Finally in Vietnam the minister signed ODA projects as a way to strengthen the strategic partnerships between the two nations (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 2016). Rivalry between Japan and China in Southeast Asia From this visit to China by the minister it is evident that rivalries do exist at a suppressed form in that the two countries are striving to improve bilateral relationship which seemed to be falling apart. The minister in his speech remarked that the visit was the first after four years which is quite a long time. The two nations are close neighbors who thrive in different ideologies and the minister was calling for an open dialogue to address contentious issues between them (Anon, 2016). These issues may be linked to the East and South China Sea, Taiwan independence among other issues. Conclusion The ministers tour may have a significant impact imminently in the future as Japans foreign policy was deeply articulated and bilateral ties strengthen. It was an important step in making Japan a big player globally in Socio-economic and political ties. References Anon, (2016). [image] Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSyCE_iPZcofeature=youtu.be [Accessed 28 May 2016]. Aljazeera (2016). The new Japanese assertiveness in Asia Pacific. [online] Available at: https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2016/04/japanese-assertiveness-asia-pacific-160405103357842.html [Accessed 28 May 2016]. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2016). Foreign Minister Kishida Visits China. [online] Available at: https://www.mofa.go.jp/a_o/c_m1/cn/page3e_000489.html#section2 [Accessed 28 May 2016]. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2016). ASEAN Policy Speech Diversity and Connectivity Role of Japan as a Partner by H.E. Mr. Fumio Kishida Minister fo... [online] Available at: https://www.mofa.go.jp/a_o/rp/page4e_000424.html [Accessed 28 May 2016]. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2016). Foreign Minister Kishida Meets with State Counselor and Foreign Minister of Myanmar. [online] Available at: https://www.mofa.go.jp/s_sa/sea1/mm/page3e_000487.html [Accessed 28 May 2016]. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2016). Japan-Laos Foreign Ministers' Meeting. [online] Available at: https://www.mofa.go.jp/s_sa/sea1/la/page3e_000485.html [Accessed 28 May 2016]. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2016). Japan-Viet Nam Foreign Ministers' Meeting. [online] Available at: https://www.mofa.go.jp/s_sa/sea1/vn/page3e_000488.html [Accessed 28 May 2016]. The Asahi Shimbun. (2016). In Bangkok, Kishida reaffirms Japans economic ties to ThailandThe Asahi Shimbun. [online] Available at: https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/AJ201605020017.html [Accessed 28 May 2016].

The Vicissitude of Faith in Night by Elie Wiesel free essay sample

The Vicissitude of Faith in Night When we’re young and we have a toy or a play thing, we get angry if that thing is taken away from us; we throw a tantrum. This is because the toy retains our focus and interest, and then it’s just ripped away. Elie Wiesel was prematurely ripped from his world of family and faith, forced to the infamous concentration camp of Auschwitz to wither away along with the burned remains of his past and hopes. The drastic change from Wiesel’s rendition of his experiences during the Holocaust, Night, portrays many themes throughout the entirety of its pages, with one of the most prominent themes being Elie’s own faith and its vicissitude over time, of which is seen in the early years of his life where he was devout to his religion, to the train ride and arrival at Auschwitz where he begs God to help, ending in the death of his God as the children are hung, and the total rejection of a God altogether. We will write a custom essay sample on The Vicissitude of Faith in Night by Elie Wiesel or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page As a child, before the Holocaust, Wiesel was a fervent and dedicated Jew. Early in the pages of Night, Wiesel recalls a question that his father had asked him. â€Å" ‘Why do you pray? ’ he asked me, after a moment. Why did I pray? A strange question. Why did I live? Why did I breathe? † (Wiesel 2). Wiesel’s life is centered around his religion; he finds it completely abstruse for his father to question his praying, because praying is what he does. Praying, faith, Judaism; all these things are his toys. Wiesel doesn’t just worship to worship, he worships because that is the thing he gets to play with. Imagine if these toys were taken away from him? These are just any toys, these toys are essential to his sanity and well-being. He compares his faith and prayer to his breathing. Not only does he need them, but losing them would be a debility that Wiesel isn’t sure he can face. Despite the necessity to retain this, they ignore the warnings and threats that the Nazis pose, and he and his family remain almost blissfully ignorant of the fact that there is the threat of their toys being ripped away and everything they know languishing into little more than a memory. This threat is sitting right in their front yard, and they have no idea of the vicissitude that will come and change their lives when the threat walks onto the porch, rolls up its sleeves, and knocks on the door. â€Å"Anguish. German soliders— with their steel helmets, and their emblem, the death’s hand. † (Wiesel 7). Everybody had denied it, but there they were. The Germans had come to Elie’s home of Sighet despite everyone’s belief. The Germans seemed nice at first, but this view would be ephemeral. The Germans first housed themselves inside the homes of the Jews, but this soon cascaded into constantly forcing them to give up their valuables, pushing them away from their homes until one day they were loaded onto the train and all Elie had left were the clothes on his back, his family, and God. The events leading up to his arrival were periods where he begged for God. He begged to God, whom he had dedicated his life, to save him and his family from the abrasive fist of the concentration camp. Once at the reception center, this is where he the game changes. When he watches the people around him pray for their lives, he just wonders â€Å"Why? † Why should he bless His name, when He has gone mute? In just a few short weeks, everything that he ever based his life on he questioned and went against. This changes his view on the world entirely. He now knows that God, the one who has always been beside him, can turn away from the torture of millions of people like it were nothing. He went from wholeheartedly giving his life to God, to eventually abjuring him altogether and getting angry at him. This is totally different for him; he’d never felt any distain for him until then. This shatters him, but at least his God is still there; still existent even though he looks away from the destruction. Unfortunately, this can’t last long. Wiesel had endured a lot during his time in concentration camps. Knowing that his God had turned his back on him was painful; without God the conditions made him extremely vulnerable and blighted. The Germans were persistent in crushing every one of them. They were determined to teach those who stepped out of line a lesson, and give an example of punishments to everyone else. And so, thusly, there were hangings. And, at one of these hangings was a child, who had been accused of something by the Germans and was thusly hanged. You can tell that all of Wiesel’s hope in God is lost when he says, â€Å" ‘Where is He? Here He is— He is hanging here on this gallows†¦Ã¢â‚¬â„¢ † (Wiesel 62). Whilst everyone is looking for God, he already knows where he is. He is dead; he has been hanged just like everyone else. Before, he just rejected his God. God was just a figure who had ignored him in a time of need. But when he witnessed those hangings, he realized that God had not turned his back on him. God had tried to enter and was murdered. The safety of God and the sanctuary that comes with it was dead inside all of them. It was not God who had turned his back; it was the Germans who had forced him away. Wiesel went through many treacherous experiences during his time in concentration camps, but one of the worst was the change in is faith. Judaism used to be his world, he used to dedicate his life to it. It says early on in the book that every day he would study the Talmud in the first half of the day, and then he would go to the synagogue in the other half. One day, this was all ripped away from him. He used to be faithful, but soon afterwards he was left with the dawning realization that the God he was begging for help would no longer listen. He wouldn’t listen because his God couldn’t listen anymore. The Nazis made sure that anything having to do with Judaism was punished and murdered, and that goes for his God too. His toy was faith, the God that lay inside him where he could go for hope. But the Nazis took it away from him. At first, it would seem as if God had betrayed him. This was not the case, God had not betrayed him. The God that he held inside him, the God he loved and lived with and the God who had always been there had been beaten out of him and killed. This toy was a piece of him he can never have back. All because someone came up, took it, and crushed it. The toy became broken, and just like that, so did Wiesel.